Jordi Rosado Diaz

617591022 jordirosado@jordirosado.com c/carlit 10, Fontanals de Cerdanya. Spain

PRESENT

2017 is the first anyo of my artistic career in which I make known my work:

-February 2017 collective abstract art exhibition at LADAME GALLERY LONDON

-Abril 2017 participation in KÖLNER LISTE 2017

-SUMMER - EXPO 2017

INTERNATIONAL COLLECTIVE EXHIBITION IN BARCELONA

-Selected for the edition of the contemporary art book: Imitation of life.

Edited by LOOSENART GALLERY. December 2017

-FRAMMENTI SENZA TEMPO (Timeless Fragments) FESTIVAL of Visual, Sound and Performing

Arts. December 2017 ( Italy)

-Selected for the edition of the contemporary art magazine.

Edited by WOTISART November 2017

-Recollection January 11 – February 10, 2018 . Union Street Gallery( Chicago). Work La Pell 1.1

In these sentences I will not explain exactly what I want to tell in my work, what it means what I photograph. I really express

myself visually, so I try to explain in words what photography would be like chewing the food for someone else. Giving too

many explanations about your own work leads to people seeing your work as you want them to see it and not really how

they see it. For that reason my words try to justify that I am going to give only a few references of what my creations are,

since you need them. In many of my works and part of my work, it is related to existence. Not only with the existence of the

human being, if not, what the human being does not see or does not know does not exist. I mean that in many of my works

what I do is to make things exist, that would not exist without the presence of the human being. I understand that if you see

one of my works, if I do not explain exactly what it is, you will never think what I want to express. Therefore, the existence

of thought in front of the same image is multiple. Hence the idea of, my works need to be explained before being seen?

Only suggestive titles that evoke you to my thought? or free interpretation?

I would like more the free interpretation, what evokes the image to the spectator is its reality and the spectator makes his

existence his.

All the thought about existence, reality and free thought is what I do with my work.

At the same time I love working aesthetics for aesthetics. If more pretensions, without more hidden ideas, without anything.

When you flow with your surroundings, when the image speaks to you, you only make it appear on paper.

This is a way of working that I love. Since I think the world is fantastic and beautiful. I have a lot of luck to think like that and

have found a photographer like Michel Kenna, I really do not know if he is an inspiration source, or an influence in my work.

An artist with whom I feel very comfortable is Pablo Picasso, because when I do not think that the world is m, aravilloso and

fantastic, I think of the amount of shit we have at our disposal. It is from there that some of my works have a character

more ... INFINITE SUFFERING, These works, are not influenced by Pablo Picasso, if not they are encontaradas with his

work. Infinite suffering, a dialogue with the cavallo of guernica, or Nina about the suffering of women.

Once commented my work and some of my reference artists. I think it's enough to introduce myself.

If to value my work you need more written information, please tell me. Jo is not an art sales professional, and I understand

that in order to sell, you need all kinds of marketing and artist information.